Natural Resources Canada Government of Canada
Contact us Help Search Canada Site
Home Inside EQCan Request Data Quick Links Site Map
 
Satellite image of Canada
Natural Resources
Canada

/Earthquakes Canada
EqCan Home
Recent Earthquakes
Historic Events
Earthquake Hazard
Be Prepared!
Stations and Data
General Information
Products / Research
Resources
Earthquake Search
Hazard Calculator
Seismogram Viewer
Station Book
Waveform Data
External Links.
 
EqCan Site Map
Contact EqCan
 
Proactive Disclosure
/
Printer version Printer version

/
Natural Resources Canada
Earth Sciences Sector > Priorities > Canadian Hazards Information Service > Earthquakes Canada


Bent-Allison-L

Source parameters of the damaging Cornwall-Massena earthquake of 1944 from regional waveforms.



Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.86; 2, Pages 489-497. 1996.



ABSTRACT

The Cornwall-Massena earthquake (M (sub w) 5.8) of 5 September 1944 was one of the most damaging earthquakes in Canadian history. Its epicenter, near the Canada-United States border and the southern end of the Western Quebec seismic zone, lies within a heavily populated region, rendering this earthquake significant for regional seismic hazard analysis. The reappearance of a seismogram collection from the 1940s previously unavailable to (recent) researchers helps provide new insight into this earthquake. Waveforms recorded at regional distances indicate that this was a mid-crustal (20-km deep) oblique thrust event (strike 313 degrees , dip 70 degrees , rake 52 degrees ). Either nodal plane is a plausible fault plane in terms of the local and regional seismotectonics -- one is more consistent with the seismicity pattern and the other with the mapped faults. The mechanism is similar to those determined for many smaller and more recent events in the Western Quebec seismic zone and is consistent with the regional stress field. The low value of a previously determined m (sub b) (4.6) relative to the moment magnitude is at least partially a result of the P-wave radiation pattern and the distribution of stations used to calculate m (sub b) . Previously calculated values for M (sub s) range from 5.1 to 5.6. While the larger number is more consistent with the M (sub w) determined in this study, the reason for the large variation in M (sub s) values has not yet been fully explained.

Last modified 2008-07-09 top of page Important notices
http://www.earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca/zones/WQSZ/wquref/bent96.php